Macho nature? Or, Gender in New Nature Writing Part I

An interesting post (and a really good ecocritical blog, I think – do check it out) on gender and Nature Writing, a subject that has exercised some of us Wild Writers quite often…

Elaine

Astrid Bracke

Sure, the few tentativeattempts at defining a new British nature writing suggest that this is a (sub) genre dominated by men, with the notable exception of Kathleen Jamie. Nonetheless, I’d never really thought of these new British nature writing texts in terms of gender – perhaps the result of years of reading of ecocritical texts in which such gendered approaches to nature are often, and so successfully, deconstructed.

So I hadn’t given gender – and gendered experiences of landscape – in new British nature writing much thought until I came across Adam Nicolson’s SeaRoom (2001). In this declaration of love to the Shiant islands in Northern Scotland, Nicolson, quite matter-of-factly, calls the sea “the male domain” (65), and that made me wonder: really? To what extent do we still perceive nature in gendered terms? And, more interestingly, do male and female experiences of nature in new British nature…

View original post 968 more words

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Wildeasters. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Macho nature? Or, Gender in New Nature Writing Part I

  1. astridbracke says:

    Thanks Elaine, for reblogging this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s